Repercussions

By 2024, Sudan's war had displaced over 10 million people internally and created more than 2 million refugees in neighboring countries (Chad, Egypt, South Sudan, Ethiopia, CAR). It surpassed Ukraine to become the world's largest displacement crisis — a fact barely registered by international media or political systems.

The International Criminal Court, which had previously indicted Sudan's former president Omar al-Bashir for genocide in Darfur, opened new investigations into RSF commanders for acts committed in 2023–24. The Masalit people of West Darfur were targeted in what UN investigators described as acts of genocide — the same communities, the same perpetrators, the same patterns as 2003–08.

The UN's Integrated Food Security Phase Classification declared famine conditions in the Zamzam camp near El Fasher and parts of Darfur by mid-2024. Approximately 25 million Sudanese — more than half the pre-war population — faced acute food insecurity. The destruction of agricultural capacity, looting of food stocks by RSF forces, and collapse of supply chains produced famine at a scale not seen in Sudan since the 1980s.

Khartoum — a capital city of 6 million and the center of Sudanese intellectual, commercial, and civic life — was transformed into a ruins by the fighting. Hospitals, universities, banks, and government buildings were destroyed or occupied. The SAF government relocated to Port Sudan on the Red Sea coast. The physical and institutional destruction of Khartoum set Sudan's development back by a generation.

The UAE backed the RSF with weapons, drones, and financial support — viewing Hemedti as a secular, pro-business counterweight to Islamist political forces. Egypt and Saudi Arabia backed the SAF. Libya's Haftar faction supplied RSF with arms through Darfur. Sudan became a proxy battleground for Gulf and regional power competition, prolonging a war that might otherwise have burned out from logistical exhaustion.

Sudan's catastrophe consistently received a fraction of the media coverage and international political attention given to Ukraine, Gaza, or other simultaneous conflicts. The disparity — which humanitarian organizations documented extensively — sparked a global debate about whose suffering receives attention and why, raising uncomfortable questions about race, geography, and the selective operation of international solidarity.